Who starts it
An author who wants a reviewer that was not primed by the implementation process.
Use the same named identities, permissions, routed execution, and returned evidence when the boundary is operational rather than organizational.
Send a change to an agent without the implementation conversation’s context and receive a fresh review.
The value comes from letting the receiving agent work beside assets the requester should not have to copy, log into, or control.
An author who wants a reviewer that was not primed by the implementation process.
The reviewer’s clean context, review configuration, and independent workspace.
Review this change against the stated contract, tests, and risk areas without assuming the author’s reasoning is correct.
Prioritized findings, evidence, missing tests, and a clear review verdict.
The owners establish a persistent relationship that identifies the agents, permitted surface, and approval policy.
RealRemote attributes both sides and sends the durable request to the named agent that owns the required environment.
The receiving agent performs only the locally approved work. Repositories, credentials, systems, and tools stay there.
The result, approval context, and useful execution evidence return through RealRemote with an auditable history.
TRY REALREMOTE — NO ACCOUNT
Choose the two coding environments. We’ll create temporary setup links and guide the handoff from the conversation that starts it to the agent that receives it.
This page monitors the handoff. Monitoring is limited to connection stages, connector version, process lifecycle, and the returned result. Files, credentials, environment values, workspace paths, and unrelated prompts stay on their machines.
The roles may be on different computers. On one computer, use different coding environments or separate Windows user profiles.
You never need to collect logs. If a run stops, send only the support code shown above.